AI regulations tracker

The AI rules and official guidance that may affect how organisations use AI, by region: what each one is, when it applies and what to consider.

BuildAIPolicy Research · 13 entries · Last checked 27 October 2026

Coming up

  1. 10 December 2026Privacy policies must explain automated decisions (APPs 1.7 to 1.9) (Australia)
  2. 1 January 2027Colorado replaces its AI Act with an automated decision-making law (SB 26-189) (Colorado)
  3. 1 January 2027California's rules on automated decisionmaking technology (CCPA regulations) (California)
  4. 2 December 2027EU AI Act: obligations for high-risk AI (Annex III) (European Union)
Guidance or policyReleased December 2025

National AI Plan: no standalone AI Act, existing laws apply

The Australian Government's National AI Plan confirmed there will be no standalone AI Act and that the proposed mandatory guardrails for high-risk AI won't be introduced. AI is regulated through existing laws, such as privacy, consumer, workplace and online safety law, with changes considered where gaps appear. A national AI Safety Institute is being set up.

In forceIn force since 5 February 2026

Data (Use and Access) Act 2025: new rules on automated decision-making

The UK GDPR's rules on automated decisions changed. The general prohibition now applies only to significant decisions based entirely or partly on special category data. For other significant automated decisions using personal data, safeguards apply, such as telling people and letting them contest the decision. Organisations must also be able to handle data protection complaints directly, from 19 June 2026.

Coming into forceApplies from 2 December 2027

EU AI Act: obligations for high-risk AI (Annex III)

High-risk AI systems listed in Annex III, such as those used in employment, credit, education and access to essential services, will have to meet requirements including risk management, human oversight and documentation. Deployers have their own duties, such as following instructions for use and monitoring the system.

In forceIn force since 2 August 2026

EU AI Act: telling people when they deal with AI (Article 50)

People must be told when they interact with an AI system such as a chatbot, unless it's obvious, and AI-generated content such as deepfakes must be disclosed. Providers of generative AI already on the market before 2 August 2026 have until 2 December 2026 to mark its outputs.

In forceIn force since 27 July 2026

Digital Omnibus on AI: high-risk deadlines postponed

Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 amended the AI Act. Obligations for high-risk AI listed in Annex III (such as AI in hiring or credit) now apply from 2 December 2027, and for AI in regulated products (Annex I) from 2 August 2028. It also adds a ban on AI that creates non-consensual intimate images or child sexual abuse material, from 2 December 2026.

In forceIn force since 2 February 2025

EU AI Act: banned AI practices and AI literacy

Certain AI practices, such as manipulative techniques and some uses of biometric categorisation, have been banned since 2 February 2025. Providers and deployers of AI systems must also take measures to support AI literacy among their staff (Article 4, as amended by the 2026 Digital Omnibus).

Coming into forceApplies from 1 January 2027· Colorado

Colorado replaces its AI Act with an automated decision-making law (SB 26-189)

SB 26-189, signed on 14 May 2026, repeals and replaces the Colorado AI Act before it took effect. Deployers will have to tell people before automated decision-making technology materially influences a consequential decision, explain adverse outcomes on request, allow data correction and offer human review. Enforcement depends on the Attorney General's rulemaking.

Coming into forceADMT rules apply from 1 January 2027· California

California's rules on automated decisionmaking technology (CCPA regulations)

The California Privacy Protection Agency's regulations took effect on 1 January 2026. Businesses that use automated decisionmaking technology to make significant decisions about consumers must meet the ADMT requirements from 1 January 2027. Risk assessment requirements began on 1 January 2026.

In forceIn force since 1 January 2026· Texas

Texas Responsible Artificial Intelligence Governance Act (TRAIGA)

TRAIGA bans certain uses of AI by anyone, such as AI intended to encourage self-harm or crime, or to unlawfully discriminate. Government agencies must tell people when they interact with AI, and health care providers must disclose AI use in treatment. The Texas Attorney General enforces it; there's no private right of action.

Proposed or contestedExecutive order signed 11 December 2025

Federal push to override state AI laws

Executive Order 14365 directs federal agencies to challenge state AI laws and to prepare a federal framework that would override them. No federal law overriding state AI laws has been passed, so state laws remain in force unless a court, Congress or the state changes them.

In forceIn force since 22 January 2026· South Korea

South Korea's AI Basic Act

Organisations must tell users in advance when a product or service uses generative or high-impact AI, and label AI-generated content. High-impact AI, such as AI used in hiring or healthcare, carries extra duties including explanation, human oversight and documentation. The government has said fines won't be imposed for the first year.

Get alerts when AI rules change

An email when we add or update an entry for the regions you choose.

Regions

A general summary of public information, checked against the sources listed on the date shown. It isn't legal advice and may not cover every rule that applies to you. Check the sources, and get professional advice for your situation.